About the Author
Previous Posts
- Folio Article: Embrace Content
- A Digital Mag Providers Take...
- Content Consistency is Getting More Challenging
- The Rise and Fall of Digital Magazines
- CMA Conference focuses on B2B Content Marketing
- ABM Custom Media PowerPoint Presentation Available...
- Unique Content the Best Way to Build Community
- The Switch from Branded Entertainment to Entertain...
- Content Marketing Catching On
- Content Predictions for 2007
Archives
Blog
Cup of Joe
A Digital Mag Providers Take...
Was trolling the web and found some feedback from NXTbook, a customer and partner of ours, regarding my digital magazine musings. Check it out here.
I agree with Marcus on this point...digital mags have come very far in the last few years. The next versions may not look anything like we have now, and probably won't even be called digital magazines.
Read More
I agree with Marcus on this point...digital mags have come very far in the last few years. The next versions may not look anything like we have now, and probably won't even be called digital magazines.
Labels: digital magazines, NXTbook
The Rise and Fall of Digital Magazines
I had the privilege of speaking this morning at an Association Trends panel on "Doing the Digital Dance" - a roundtable focusing on best practices in association digital publishing.
Overall, there was a very interesting discussion around what the future truly holds in eMedia publishing opportunities. Of the 50 or so people in attendance, about half had not started an eMedia effort.
One of the topics that came up was the digital magazine as a replacement for a traditional print magazine. I don't think that will ever happen. Frankly, the digital magazine is a temporary solution, at best. Don't get me wrong...the digital magazine is much better than having a pdf. Tracking is outstanding. When used for audience development and international distribution, it's near perfect. It's also great as a teaser to get people to subscribe to receive the print publication.
Still, the best metrics we've seen is about 15% of the total print distribution subscribe and open a digital version.
But let's put it this way...the digital magazine is very similar to taking a radio broadcast and putting it on the television. Just doesn't seem to work. People digest content much differently on the web than they do in print. Yes, it's great that the digital version is interactive (can jump from one page to another with ease), but people don't read a digital magazine the same as they do in print. Long-form content, like that in print publications, is better read in a printed format. People use the web to get exact information quickly. Even the twenty-somethings I know print out an article that goes beyond the viewable screen.
So, for now, it's fine to have available...a great value in many cases...but it IS temporary. A better idea is to take the long-form content from your print publication and integrate it into vertical "chunks" on your web site or microsite.
Baby steps are still needed in this business...we just take them much quicker in the ever-changing world of eMedia publishing.
Read More
Overall, there was a very interesting discussion around what the future truly holds in eMedia publishing opportunities. Of the 50 or so people in attendance, about half had not started an eMedia effort.
One of the topics that came up was the digital magazine as a replacement for a traditional print magazine. I don't think that will ever happen. Frankly, the digital magazine is a temporary solution, at best. Don't get me wrong...the digital magazine is much better than having a pdf. Tracking is outstanding. When used for audience development and international distribution, it's near perfect. It's also great as a teaser to get people to subscribe to receive the print publication.
Still, the best metrics we've seen is about 15% of the total print distribution subscribe and open a digital version.
But let's put it this way...the digital magazine is very similar to taking a radio broadcast and putting it on the television. Just doesn't seem to work. People digest content much differently on the web than they do in print. Yes, it's great that the digital version is interactive (can jump from one page to another with ease), but people don't read a digital magazine the same as they do in print. Long-form content, like that in print publications, is better read in a printed format. People use the web to get exact information quickly. Even the twenty-somethings I know print out an article that goes beyond the viewable screen.
So, for now, it's fine to have available...a great value in many cases...but it IS temporary. A better idea is to take the long-form content from your print publication and integrate it into vertical "chunks" on your web site or microsite.
Baby steps are still needed in this business...we just take them much quicker in the ever-changing world of eMedia publishing.
Labels: Association Trends, digital magazines, eMedia
B2B Marketing Trends
See Details

Managed Care Oncology
See Details



